Teasing the Kids

“Daddy,” asked little girl of six, “what is the difference between teasing and lying?”

Hmm. I had to think about that (like Susan Boyle did). After thinking about it, I came up with a good reply. I said, “I’m not quite sure. Let me think about that.” And now that I’ve thought about it, I’m really not so sure anymore. I looked up teasing in the dictionary. It says things that boil down to “annoy by constant bothering”. The silly dictionary people – they don’t even include the meaning I mean. Suddenly I’m Tweedledum.

By teasing, I mean that when the little girl asks, “Daddy can I go to the zoo?” and Daddy replies, “if the zoo wants you they can come and get you.” The tease is that Daddy is pretending to misunderstand. It’s when the little girls says, “I’m learning to lead,” Daddy says, “that’s good, the country needs good leaders”, even though he knows she meant “read”, but is still finding the some letters lather ploblematic. It’s not true, you see. Daddy did understand. Daddy is just … teasing.

In teasing, the thing is not true, and everyone knows it’s not true. “Kidding” is maybe a better word – but it’s rather American. We don’t kid on this side of the Atlantic. We have kids though, and they are not goats.

That’s the rub. It’s not true. It is a lie. A mini-white lie. So what is this toying with the truth then? If we believe the dictionary people, it’s not even part of the word “tease”, so how did it become part of our lives?

Learning to be a good teaser takes a lifetime of practice, and is part of our family traditions. Seriously! We take teasing very seriously. We even have a couple of long-term jokes lined up for our children, such as what the business of the vening people is who drive past in vans with refrigerators. (That’s like vending people, just without the “d”.)

My dad told us one day that the car was not parked in the same place as before, since the shopping center used fork lifts to pick up the cars and move them from place to place according to capacity. I think he thought we would know that it was clearly beyond the realm of possibility: a joke, and a funny one at that. The interesting part is that both my sister and I believed him for years, and kept an eye out for those sneaky forklifts. We supposed that they were not used very often. My dad would tap on the roof of the car while driving, “to keep the elephants away.” In many years of tapping, not one elephant landed on our car. My mom said to cut it out when the children also started tapping on the roof.

There is a whole branch of psychology dedicated to assigning blame for our troubles to others. I think the next generation will have plenty to say about us.

Posted in Stuff | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Teasing the Kids

One-way reconcilliation

I heard on the radio yesterday something I’ve heard before — that many black folks in South Africa believe that reconcilliation is a one-way street — that blacks have forgiven whites for the evils of the past, but white people have done nothing towards being reconciled with black folks.

I wondered, is this true? Have they really forgiven white folks? It is quite possible that white folks are not doing their bit, but are these folks right about the first part? Are they being honest? Have they become the friends of white sinners and received nothing in return?

I don’t think this is true. There is something that we have not seen from black people towards white people: evangelism. When you are reconciled to someone, you begin to treat them as a person, and you share things that are important with them so that it will go well with them. If you believe in the gospel, and you really love someone, you share the gospel with them. What are the black Christians doing?

Back in the dark days of apartheid, most white Christians did precious little to share the gospel with their black countrymen. This was because, by and large, they didn’t love them as they should have, and it shows that they absorbed apartheidthink. However, despite these persistent non-efforts there are Christian churches among black people.

Now, what efforts are these folks making to share the wonderful message of reconcilliation with the light-skinned sinners that formerly mismanged the country? If there was a feeling of forgiveness towards white folks, would black churches not be making an effort to share the gospel of forgiveness with white people that they are forgiving? Are we to believe that black churches are in such a parlous state that they feel no need of spreading the gospel? Are they isolated from the community, and have somehow missed out on all this forgiveness that is floating around?

When will we hear about black folks harrassing the proud white folks, and telling them to turn or burn? When will we hear about cross-cultural missionaries praying for the salvation of the white savages, and that they will repent of their evil ways?

I’m waiting to hear of it.

Posted in Stuff | Tagged , , | Comments Off on One-way reconcilliation

Bum bum cream

When I was growing up, “bum” was a bad word, for which you could get your mouse, um, mouth washed out with soap. Now they put it on little bottles of barrier cream for babies. Oh dear. A bad word has escaped into common use. Now, the point is, the wife was at the hospital with the new kid, and was changing the kid’s nappy. This necessarily implies singing the nappy song. This here nappy changing song was quite a hit with all the nurses and other mommies. An appreciative audience of three means that someone out there on the very weird Internet will like it. So, without further delay, here are the lyrics of The Bum Cream Song, to the tune of “We All Stand Together”.

Bum, bum cream, Bum, bum cream
Bum cream is what makes our child’s name here scream
Bum, bum cream
Bum, bum cream
He screams for his bum cream (bum bum)

Aai, yaai yaai, yaai yaai yaai yaai yaai
Screaming through half of the night (b b b bum bum cream)
Aai, yaai yaai, yaai yaai yaai yaai yaai
Is he all right?
Won’t he keep quiet!?

Bum, bum cream (nappy rash!), Bum, bum cream (nappy rash!)
Bum cream is what makes our child’s name here scream (nappy rash!)
Bum, bum cream (nappy rash!)
Bum, bum cream (nappy rash!)
He screams for his bum cream (nappy rash!)

He screams
Solo by child
for
Solo by child
his bum cream! (Bum bum bum bum bum cream!)

This is Africa. We don’t have diapers here. We have nappies. It’s the same stuff, actually. Speaking of nappies, this is the other nappy song … to the tune of “Time to Say Goodbye”

Time to …. change your nappy ….
If we change your nappy, you will be happy,
Be happy be happy be .. happy!
It’s time to change your …

    (bridge)
    It is time to change your nappy so that you can be ha–ppy.
    If we change your nappy you will be, you will be oh so very happy, happy, happy

(Change key, like Andrea Bocelli)
Time to …. change your nappy ….
If we change your nappy, you will be happy,
Be happy be happy be .. happy!
It’s time to change your nappy.

When we started, as inexperienced nappy changers, we sang through the song a few times to get the thing changed. Later, we finished the job before finishing the song. Here is how to do it:

  • Begin singing song
  • Remove old nappy and poo in one go
  • Zap in new nappy to catch drips
  • Clean up remaining mess
  • Apply bum cream
  • For new babies, clean the unbiblical cord
  • Finish song, with solo parts by child
Posted in Stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Bum bum cream

When is pain not a pain?

A little girl was screaming outside. By the sound if it, it could be quite serious. I went out to find out what it was about. Hmm, maybe not – the little thing was curled up in a lump on the grass. Her sister, who might normally help her, was nowhere to be seen. I inspected her hands, legs and head.
“There’s no blood,” I told her. “What’s the problem?”
“My sister pulled my hair,” she managed to cry, between lolling around on the floor, like a beached whale would if the lawn was a good place to beach.
Ah, not only an injury, but an offence. So off we went, to tell the bully sister that she was forgiven for her most cruel pulling of hair.
“I forgive you for pulling my hair.” (Hug)
“Here’s something nice for you,” said the offender.
Close, but not quite. I suggested, “Don’t you want to say something to your sister about pulling her hair?”
“I’m sorry I pulled your hair.” Ah, sweet, the offender shows repentance.
“It’s okay, it wasn’t so sore.”

Posted in Stuff | Tagged , , | Comments Off on When is pain not a pain?

St Francis Dam Failure

My wife is reading about the dam busters bombers, which set me to reading about dam failures. I found an incredible* presentation about the St Francis Dam failure. It is entitled a “Reassessment of the St Francis Dam failure” This is a dam which burst in 1928 after standing for two years, and took 420 people along, when it did. The (re)assessment is from an engineering and geological point of view, and the writer suggests that there were many flaws in the design and investigation.

The interesting thing is how difficult it is to do a forensic examination of a single known event (a broken dam) with a large amount of relevant information about the initial conditions (photographs, engineering drawings, surveys), and this, relatively soon after the event. This is a real example of geological forensics — in a flood context nogal. The degree of remaining uncertainty after all is said and done is quite remarkable.

An interesting statement which the paper makes, in assessing how all manner of misunderstanding (including geological) contributed to the disaster. It gives an idea of how geologists tend to think:

“We will not identify those geologic features or structures for which we are not specifically looking. We have to have in mind what we are seeking, realizing that we will seldom be able to recognize those features with which we’ve had little prior experience”

I wonder …

  • Considering how carefully one has to work with well documented events to reach tentative conclusions, how much confidence should we have in geology that works without any written historical testimony, yet purports to tell us exactly how events unfolded over bzillions of years?
  • One of the problems noted in the design of the St Francis Dam is “Hydraulic uplift not relieved on sloping abutments ( a common problem until 1960s)”. As a layman, that means that the water presses down onto the surface below, and that pushes the walls up. I wonder about the dams around South Africa which were built before the 1960’s — Kariba Dam in Zimbabwe was built in the 1950’s. Bert worked on the Kariba dam, and one of the things he was involved with was flushing out crumbling wet material, and replacing it with concrete, because the dam wall began vibrating as the dam filled up (that’s apparently not cool). He said this was because the geological survey up the side of the slope was done to the required depth, but relative to the surface, rather than relative to the lowest point. The presence of porous rock way beneath the dam wall was not known as a result. I wonder if they ran into this problem because of a lack of more recent engineering insights, and I also wonder if the fix for the problem solved other problems at the same time.


* and when I say “incredible”, I don’t mean that it is not credible.

Posted in Stuff | Tagged , , | Comments Off on St Francis Dam Failure

Stuff

Time for a blog. Mainly to test security stuff and kick wordpress around in the hope that it will break. Anyhow, I’m thinking of putting stuff here, like all about the books (both paperware and vapourware), rants about traffic, deep thoughts about life and truth, and family. Maybe also requests for special food (what’s for supper tonight, dear? Toast you say? Yay!). The odd smattering of code might help. Anything that can be filed as “stuff”. That should keep it focussed. As I have previously shared my thoughts with the world, and experienced the depth of the appreciation for those same thoughts, I knew that the time would eventually come when these same people could advise me not to write, as they advise me not to speak.

Okay, so I’m fiddling php.ini. This is great, but I need something to test on. Stupid stupid. Now I have to set up this thing. Probably going to get so hacked so fast. Oh well. Okay, I’ve learned some stuff. WordPress cannot live without create_function() – it uses it a lot. This stinks, because that function is, well, not a nice function, which I would gladly disable.

So this is my very own php.ini disable_functions list, snarfed from everyone that has one:

disable_functions = shell_exec,exec,system,passthru,popen,proc_open,
pass_thru,pcntl_exec,proc_close,proc_get_status,proc_nice,proc_terminate,
dl,pclose,pfsockopen,posix_kill,phpinfo,escapeshellcmd,show_source,glob,
hopenbasedir,link,symlink,ini_alter,escapeshellarg,posix_mkfifo,mysql_list_dbs,
get_current_user,getmyi,syslog,socket_create_pair,socket_bind,pcntl_fork,
pcntl_signal,pcntl_waitpid,pcntl_wexitstatus,pcntl_wifexited,pcntl_wifsignaled,
pcntl_wifstopped,pcntl_wstopsig,pcntl_wtermsig,openlog,
apache_get_modules,apache_get_version,apache_getenv,apache_note,
apache_setenv,virtual

That’s pretty stirring stuff, isn’t it? Well, it was, but the stylesheet needed some work. Whose idea was it to include in CSS a method for overlapping text from one line to the next as a default way of displaying content? Very good work to him, but, um, it would have been nice if there was a better way…

Posted in Stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on Stuff